The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
CC-BY
Lưu vào:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Nhà xuất bản: |
Springer
2023
|
| Chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367 |
| Từ khóa: |
Thêm từ khóa
Không có từ khóa, Hãy là người đầu tiên đánh dấu biểu ghi này!
|
| id |
oai:localhost:PNK-9367 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:localhost:PNK-93672023-09-29T03:36:19Z The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine Heritier, Paolo ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’ Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts CC-BY The article reconstructs the is/ought debate in legal theory through a phenomenological reading of the concept of normality. An analysis of Siniscalchi, Fuller and Manderson looks at the issue from the perspective of law and literature, and then applies Giambattista Vico’s rhetorical methodology within the contemporary debate. The question: “is Hume’s law really visible within Hume’s thought?” also paradoxically poses the figure of phantoms and fictions at the heart of the current theoretical debate on law. A history of the phantom placed at the centre of the history of Western institutions still remains to be written, but a comparison of very diverse and incongrous approaches such as the extended order of Hayek, the dogmatic anthropology of Legendre, the eunomics of Fuller and the new science of Vico shows how the mystery of consciousness and the mystery of institutions are inextricably entwined. 2023-09-29T03:36:19Z 2023-09-29T03:36:19Z 2022 Book https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367 en application/pdf Springer |
| institution |
Digital Phenikaa |
| collection |
Digital Phenikaa |
| language |
English |
| topic |
‘Is/Ought’ Debate’ Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts |
| spellingShingle |
‘Is/Ought’ Debate’ Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts Heritier, Paolo The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| description |
CC-BY |
| format |
Book |
| author |
Heritier, Paolo |
| author_facet |
Heritier, Paolo |
| author_sort |
Heritier, Paolo |
| title |
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| title_short |
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| title_full |
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| title_fullStr |
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine |
| title_sort |
shadow of affectivity inside the ‘is/ought’ debate’: siniscalchi, fuller, manderson and vico’s ghosts in the legal machine |
| publisher |
Springer |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367 |
| _version_ |
1779307175037894656 |
| score |
8.891145 |