The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine

CC-BY

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heritier, Paolo
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w
https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:PNK-9367
record_format dspace
spelling oai:localhost:PNK-93672023-09-29T03:36:19Z The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine Heritier, Paolo ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’ Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts CC-BY The article reconstructs the is/ought debate in legal theory through a phenomenological reading of the concept of normality. An analysis of Siniscalchi, Fuller and Manderson looks at the issue from the perspective of law and literature, and then applies Giambattista Vico’s rhetorical methodology within the contemporary debate. The question: “is Hume’s law really visible within Hume’s thought?” also paradoxically poses the figure of phantoms and fictions at the heart of the current theoretical debate on law. A history of the phantom placed at the centre of the history of Western institutions still remains to be written, but a comparison of very diverse and incongrous approaches such as the extended order of Hayek, the dogmatic anthropology of Legendre, the eunomics of Fuller and the new science of Vico shows how the mystery of consciousness and the mystery of institutions are inextricably entwined. 2023-09-29T03:36:19Z 2023-09-29T03:36:19Z 2022 Book https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367 en application/pdf Springer
institution Digital Phenikaa
collection Digital Phenikaa
language English
topic ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’
Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts
spellingShingle ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’
Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts
Heritier, Paolo
The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
description CC-BY
format Book
author Heritier, Paolo
author_facet Heritier, Paolo
author_sort Heritier, Paolo
title The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
title_short The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
title_full The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
title_fullStr The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
title_full_unstemmed The Shadow of Affectivity Inside the ‘Is/Ought’ Debate’: Siniscalchi, Fuller, Manderson and Vico’s Ghosts in the Legal Machine
title_sort shadow of affectivity inside the ‘is/ought’ debate’: siniscalchi, fuller, manderson and vico’s ghosts in the legal machine
publisher Springer
publishDate 2023
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09947-w
https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9367
_version_ 1779307175037894656
score 8.8894005