Cover Image

Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country

Open access (OA) publishing is beneficial for researchers to improve recognition, representation, and visibility in academia. However, few studies have been conducted for studying the association between gender and OA publishing likelihood. Therefore, the current study explores the impacts of gender...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen
Other Authors: Nguyen, Hoang Minh
Format: Other
Language:Vietnamese
Published: MDPI Jourmals 2022
Subjects:
Open Science
Gender Diversity
Online Access:https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/4040
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:PNK-4040
record_format dspace
spelling oai:localhost:PNK-40402022-08-17T05:54:50Z Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen Nguyen, Hoang Minh Open Science Gender Diversity Open access (OA) publishing is beneficial for researchers to improve recognition, representation, and visibility in academia. However, few studies have been conducted for studying the association between gender and OA publishing likelihood. Therefore, the current study explores the impacts of gender-based authorship structures on OA publishing in Vietnamese social sciences and humanities. Bayesian analysis was performed on a dataset of 3122 publications in social sciences and humanities. We found that publications with mixed-gender authorship were most likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31–31.65%). In contrast, the likelihood of publications with the solely male or female author(s) was lower. It is also notable that if female researcher(s) held the first-author position in an article of mixed-gender authorship, the publication would be less likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31% compared to 31.65% of male-first-author structure). In addition, publications written by a solo female author (14.19%) or a group of female authors (10.72%) had lower OA publishing probabilities than those written by a solely male author(s) (17.14%). These findings hint at the possible advantage of gender diversity and the disadvantage of gender homophily (especially female-only authorship) on OA publishing likelihood. Moreover, they show there might be some negative impacts of gender inequality on OA publishing. As a result, the notion of gender diversity, financial and policy supports are recommended to promote the open science movement. 2022-01-17T03:35:51Z 2022-01-17T03:35:51Z 2021 Other https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/4040 vi application/pdf MDPI Jourmals
institution Digital Phenikaa
collection Digital Phenikaa
language Vietnamese
topic Open Science
Gender Diversity
spellingShingle Open Science
Gender Diversity
Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen
Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
description Open access (OA) publishing is beneficial for researchers to improve recognition, representation, and visibility in academia. However, few studies have been conducted for studying the association between gender and OA publishing likelihood. Therefore, the current study explores the impacts of gender-based authorship structures on OA publishing in Vietnamese social sciences and humanities. Bayesian analysis was performed on a dataset of 3122 publications in social sciences and humanities. We found that publications with mixed-gender authorship were most likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31–31.65%). In contrast, the likelihood of publications with the solely male or female author(s) was lower. It is also notable that if female researcher(s) held the first-author position in an article of mixed-gender authorship, the publication would be less likely to be published under Gold Access terms (26.31% compared to 31.65% of male-first-author structure). In addition, publications written by a solo female author (14.19%) or a group of female authors (10.72%) had lower OA publishing probabilities than those written by a solely male author(s) (17.14%). These findings hint at the possible advantage of gender diversity and the disadvantage of gender homophily (especially female-only authorship) on OA publishing likelihood. Moreover, they show there might be some negative impacts of gender inequality on OA publishing. As a result, the notion of gender diversity, financial and policy supports are recommended to promote the open science movement.
author2 Nguyen, Hoang Minh
author_facet Nguyen, Hoang Minh
Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen
format Other
author Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen
author_sort Nguyen, Thi Thanh Huyen
title Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
title_short Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
title_full Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
title_fullStr Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
title_full_unstemmed Open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
title_sort open-access publishing probabilities according to gender-based authorship structures in an emerging country
publisher MDPI Jourmals
publishDate 2022
url https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/4040
_version_ 1751856273476812800
score 8.891145

Similar Items